The idea
The useful automation is not always the most complicated one. Often it is just the missing connection between a repeated task and the information needed to complete it.
Why I built it
Repeated work is usually not difficult; it is just easy to forget, copy incorrectly, or leave for later. Small automations make the boring parts more dependable.
How it works
Each workflow starts with the manual steps: what triggers it, where the information lives, and what a successful outcome looks like.
Things that broke
The useful failures here are still being collected. Each one should explain the problem, not just show the finished workflow.
What I learned
Good automation leaves people with more context, not less control.
What’s next
Document the workflows that turn out to be useful beyond the first experiment.